The Anonymous hacker group has announced that they will bring down 13 root DNS servers by DDoS. Is this possible? According to Hackers News, they say that it might not be completely possible to shutdown the internet because the ISP’s are pretty-well prepared for these types of attacks. At this stage, I think the chances of them being able to pull this off are basically nil because its too easy to recover from backups and make use of read-only backup DNS servers. We will find out on the 31st – (update: Looks like they failed, ‘cause the internet is still here) http://thehackernews.com/2012/03/why-hackers-cant-take-down-dns-root.html
Authorization bypass in McAfee Email And Web Security Appliance
The current McAfee Email and Web Security appliance authorization bypass functionality allows any logged-in user to reset the administrator password which results in any user becoming the administrator. If a product like “McAfee Email And Web Security Appliance” can have an authorization bypass vulnerability, how certain are you that your custom applications are secure??? http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/111362/NGS00155.txt
Verizon’s insightful 2012 Data Breach Investigations Report
An EU Cybercrime Centre to fight online criminals and protect e-consumers
The EU centre will warn EU Member States of major cybercrime threats and alert them of weaknesses in their online defences. It will identify organised cyber-criminal networks and prominent offenders in cyberspace. It will provide operational support in concrete investigations, be it with forensic assistance or by helping to set up cybercrime joint investigation teams. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/12/317&format=HTML&aged=0&la
One of the world’s leading CMS solutions, Joomla (Version 2.5.1) was vulnerable to Blind SQL Injection. Joomla reported the vulnerability February 29th and reported it resolved March 5th.
By exploiting Blind SQL Injection, an attacker can enumerate a database which can potentially result in complete loss of data and functionality. Subsequently, this vulnerability can lead to web site defacement or access to internal network.
This should serve as a reminder that building web applications on top of popular and well reviewed platforms can still leave you at risk to serious security breaches. These are the types of vulns that script-kiddies love to perform mass attacks against.
Apparently, Microsoft SharePoint 2007 & 2010 is missing protection against Frame Injection & Click-Jacking. Microsoft SharePoint fails to send X-Frame-Options to the server. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to inject a frame in the page. This frame can access information in the framed page. The way it works is that X-Frame-Options instructs the browser to disallow framing. If a content management application and SharePoint are both vulnerable, do you have all security controls in place???
Many thanks to all who attended our party. We enjoyed meeting everyone and had a great time.
As you may know, I’m a wine guy. I personally selected a range of boutique European wines for this event. The wines were very popular – many requested that we share the list of wines we tasted, so here it is.
Sebastien Brunet Domaine de la Roche Vouvray Brut NV – This sparkling Chenin Blanc was a light alternative to champagne and a nice way to start the tasting.
2010 Frantz Saumon Menu Pineau (Loire Valley, France) – Menu Pineau is an obscure grape related to Chenin Blanc. The wine had nice acidity and minerality.
2006 de Moor Bel Air et Clardy Chablis (Burgundy, France) – This chardonnay is from one of my favorite producers. The hot vintage produced a relatively fruity wine for Chablis.
2007 Huet Vouvray Le Haut Lieu Demisec (Loire Valley, France) – This off dry wine was showing a bit of age. Huet is one of my favorite Chenin Blanc producers and their wines can age for decades.
2010 Marcel Lapierre Morgon (Beaujolais, France) – This wine, made from Gamay, was showing beautifully with lovely fruit and solid acidity.
2010 Pierre Gonon Les Isles Feray, Vin de Pays de l’Ardeche (Rhone Valley, France) – This Syrah wine was showing beautiful fruit and was a crowd pleaser. I think that it has terrific complexity for an entry level, affordable wine.
2005 Francois Chidaine Montlouis Moelleux (Loire Valley, France) – This sweet chenin was starting to show some age but still had beautiful expressive fruit. Chidaine is another terrific producer in the Loire.
The wines were sourced from Terroir, one of the San Francisco’s hottest wine bars and stores focusing on small production European wines. I stay near Terroir every time I’m in San Francisco despite the somewhat ‘colorful’ neighborhood where my hotel is located.
Let me know how you like these wines. More wine tastings coming soon.
One of the more common problems that we see is customers trying to bite off more of their application infrastructure at once than they can chew. A certain amount of planning will yield better, more digestible results with substantially less indigestion.
Dropping all of acme.com into your web scanner when there are 100 applications with 50,000 pages across 60 subdomains is likely not an optimal strategy. Here are some considerations:
Scan time: Assuming reasonable connectivity and application server horsepower, a scan of a medium-sized application can take 3- 12 hours. Scanning 60 applications at once will take a week or more before the scan completes and you can start working on the results.
Information Segmentation: Most enterprises will have more than one development team. It’s not the best policy to ship detailed information about all of your vulnerabilities to people who don’t need to know it. Also, it’s much easier to have one report per application that you can just send to the team coding it so that they can fix just the vulnerabilities listed in the report.
Report Size: A scan that large will create a report that will be immense if you have any significant number of findings. Even if your vendor segments and paginates the report, it is going to be harder to navigate than a series of smaller reports.
Re-Scanning: Once the developers start remediating vulnerabilities, you will be asked to re-scan to give a clean bill of health for each application. You don’t want to have to wait the week or more an enterprise scan takes to update the development team.
The one downside to all of this is that you will have to kick off and monitor more scans. If you have a large number of applications and this is likely to be a logistical headache, you should consider an enterprise portal to schedule and monitor scans and deliver scan results (full disclosure, we offer such a tool).
As in most endeavors, a bit of planning goes a long way in making life easier. Giving some thought to breaking up your application scanning will make your application scanning program a lot easier and more effective.
Today’s show is Michael interviewing Kevin Riggins. Kevin is an Enterprise Security Architect for a Fortune 500 financial services company. Kevin and Michael have some great conversation about Kevin’s job, what he is doing at RSA, where he blogs, the book he coauthored, etc. (look below in the show notes for links to everything).
Then a fun discussion starts about cloud, risk, mobility, risk in the cloud, risk in mobility, risk of mobility integrated with the cloud, and so on. Good stuff all around.
Here’s some links to stuff about Kevin and other stuff we talked about in the show.
Management Team Member for the Society of Information Risk Analysis – link